Hi everyone!! Today the topic is about my study program.
Personally I don’t know all the changes that
have made to the program in the recent years, but I’m going to talk about of my
opinion about the changes that should make.
I always complain about the few field trips
that we have in the different subject, because they are so important for our
professional training. It helps us to improve our communicational and
observation skills, because we can learn making things by ourselves, and put
into practice all the things that we learned on class.
For example, in forest engineer, when the classes
start the first activity is in field, instead of us (agronomist) that we have
the first field trip only in one subject, two weeks later.
Also, I think several subjects have a wrong
planning. For example, “Práctica III and IV” are completely useless. The
professors are so irresponsible, they never came to classes early; the classes
were too boring and I didn’t learn something useful. Definitely, these subjects should change and
incorporate others topic on them, specially things more practices.
In
this semester I have “práctica IV” and can’t believe that we had 1 month
learning history of Chile, instead of learning agrarian politics, something
that necessary we should learn.
The same situation happens in the subjects
related to economy department, like “Agronegocios” and “Gestión de proyectos y
marketing”. In these subjects we view practically the same topics, so instead
of have two subjects should be only one, it will be so much better and that way,
could be incorporate other subjects more useful.
Finally, the study program also should
incorporate subjects similar to natural resources engineering, because we are
falling behind in learn about the new technologies for field management .
I think field trips are totally necessary for all the careers in the Campus.
ReplyDeleteI feel envy for forest students :(, we need more field trips !
ReplyDelete